Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jordi Samper-Montana vs Daniel Dutra Da Silva Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Samper-Montana vs Silva analysis and find out who is favored!
Jordi Samper-Montana vs Daniel Dutra Da Silva Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Samper-Montana 2 - 0 Silva
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Samper-Montana has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Silva has won 50.98%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Samper-Montana, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Silva has won 54.06%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 34.83% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Samper-Montana has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Silva has saved 63.16% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Samper-Montana has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Silva winning 62.5% (W/L 45/ 27) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Samper-Montana has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 69/ 51), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3). Silva has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 578/ 349), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 62/ 49).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Samper-Montana winning 2 times and Silva being victorious 0 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Samper-Montana winning 4 and Silva winning 0. The last match between Samper-Montana and Silva was at the Chile F2, 23-02-2015, Quarterfinals, Clay with Jordi Samper-Montana getting the victory 6-4 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Samper-Montana and Silva have played a deciding set 0 times, with Samper-Montana winning 0 times and Silva 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Samper-Montana winning 0, and Silva 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Samper-Montana has played against opponents with an average rank of while Silva has played against players with an average rank of 202.39.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Samper-Montana has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Silva has won 40% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Samper-Montana has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Silva has converted 47.88% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Ret.
Rank
179
High
34
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
0
Hard0
2
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
374
Rank
207
High
35
Age
L
Plays
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
Form
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
56% (442-346)
Career Total W/L
62% (640-398)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
66% (31-16)
$84,925
Career Prize Money
$16,520
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Jordi Samper-Montana vs Daniel Dutra Da Silva For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Samper-Montana VS Silva
Sportsbook
Offer
Samper-Montana VS Silva H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Jordi Samper-Montana | Daniel Dutra Da Silva |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 0 |
| Games Won | 24 | 11 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
Samper-Montana VS Silva H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-2 | |||||
| 6-2 6-3 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jordi Samper-Montana | Daniel Dutra Da Silva |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 66% (31/16) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 63% (69/40) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 56% (563/448) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 66% (29/15) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.37 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 184 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.23 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 112 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:53:25 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 198.38 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 58% (1902/3260) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 69% (1308/1902) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 51% (687/1358) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 47% (164/346) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 42% (1371/3230) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 62% (18/11) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 72% (13/5) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 65% (30/46) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 62% (8/13) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (8/16) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 87% (31/27) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 13% (31/4) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 25% (16/4) |
Jordi Samper-Montana Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 | 7-5 2-6 4-1 ret. | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats 
Jordi Samper-Montana
Player
Diego Barreto Sanchez
83%
(
44 of
53)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
77)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
43%
(
23 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
77)
69
Total Points Won
61
|
4-6 6-1 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carlos Gimeno Valero
Player
Jordi Samper-Montana
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
68)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
27%
(
3 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
18 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
64
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Raul Brancaccio
Player
Jordi Samper-Montana
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve %
56%
(
42 of
75)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
36 of
75)
74
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gengo Kikuchi
Player
Jordi Samper-Montana
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
100%
(
9 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
13%
(
4 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
54
Total Points Won
25
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jordi Samper-Montana
Player
Len Schouten
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
72)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jordi Samper-Montana
Player
Palaphoom Kovapitukted
56%
(
48 of
85)
1st Serve %
49%
(
43 of
88)
8
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
5
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
31 of
43)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
38%
(
32 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
88)
90
Total Points Won
83
|
6-2 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ko Suzuki
Player
Jordi Samper-Montana
60%
(
50 of
84)
1st Serve %
69%
(
71 of
103)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
44 of
71)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
42%
(
35 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
41 of
103)
90
Total Points Won
97
|
6-4 0-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jordi Samper-Montana
Player
Shohei Chikami
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
48%
(
29 of
61)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
17 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pol Toledo Bague
Player
Jordi Samper-Montana
72%
(
71 of
98)
1st Serve %
70%
(
62 of
88)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
62%
(
44 of
71)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
41 of
62)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
41%
(
40 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
34 of
88)
92
Total Points Won
94
|
2-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Daniel Dutra Da Silva Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Dutra Da Silva
Player
James McCabe
50%
(
13 of
26)
1st Serve %
39%
(
12 of
31)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
62%
(
8 of
13)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
92%
(
12 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
16%
(
3 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
6 of
26)
Rtn Points Won
74%
(
23 of
31)
43
Total Points Won
14
|
6-0 4-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Dutra Da Silva
Player
Michael Agwi
49%
(
47 of
95)
1st Serve %
58%
(
40 of
69)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
63%
(
30 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
38%
(
36 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
69)
87
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nikolas Sanchez-Izquierdo
Player
Daniel Dutra Da Silva
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve %
58%
(
37 of
64)
3
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
15 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Dutra Da Silva
Player
Liam Gavrielides
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve %
62%
(
26 of
42)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
55
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Dutra Da Silva
Player
Remy Bertola
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve %
57%
(
24 of
42)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
55
Total Points Won
26
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Maks Kasnikowski
Player
Daniel Dutra Da Silva
64%
(
69 of
107)
1st Serve %
64%
(
58 of
91)
5
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
74%
(
51 of
69)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
53%
(
20 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
34%
(
36 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
39 of
91)
110
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 6-7(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Dutra Da Silva
Player
Jakub Paul
67%
(
60 of
90)
1st Serve %
73%
(
61 of
83)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
41%
(
37 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
83)
91
Total Points Won
82
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Dutra Da Silva
Player
John Sperle
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve %
64%
(
44 of
69)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Dutra Da Silva
Player
Koki Matsuda
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve %
50%
(
24 of
48)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
34
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Diego Dedura-Palomero
Player
Daniel Dutra Da Silva
71%
(
84 of
119)
1st Serve %
57%
(
62 of
109)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
63%
(
53 of
84)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
40 of
62)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
40%
(
48 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
47 of
109)
118
Total Points Won
110
|
6-7(1) 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Samper-Montana Vs Silva Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Samper-Montana are available here and Silva photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
